When Learning Becomes Real
There's a particular kind of madness in the corporate world where we ask people to defend their company from sophisticated cyber criminals, then hand them a slide deck with clipart padlocks and a three-question quiz at the end. It's the equivalent of teaching someone to defuse a bomb by reading aloud from a manual. And we do it with a straight face. Every quarter. Every year. No wonder nobody remembers anything except which button finally made the webinar end.
The truth is that cyber security is messy and frantic and riddled with unknowns. It moves like weather, unpredictable and inconvenient, and it demands more from us than a polite nod of theoretical understanding. That's why experiential learning isn't a buzzword or a trend. It's the only approach that respects the reality of how humans actually learn and behave under pressure. Because when your heart rate spikes and your palms sweat and you're suddenly the protagonist in a high-stakes puzzle where one wrong click derails everything, the brain wakes up. It pays attention. It forms memories that stick instead of dissolving by lunchtime.
Why passive learning breaks down
We've known this for decades in behavioural science. Retrieval practice, embodied cognition, emotional imprinting, context-dependent memory... all the things that make information cling like burrs to the human mind. Yet somehow, organisations cling to the pedagogical equivalent of beige wallpaper: lectures, compliance modules, and those limp animations where a cartoon hacker in a hoodie endlessly tries to steal a password. And we wonder why nothing changes.
Contrast that with something like stepping inside The Syndicate, where you're infiltrating a cyber criminal family and decoding encrypted comms in real time, making high-pressure decisions with no safety net. The story creeps under your skin because it demands action rather than wishful thinking, and it makes insider risk feel personal, human, disturbingly plausible. It's a world apart from listening to someone drone about "social engineering vectors" across a Teams call.
Or take The Breach, that smug whodunnit where a single stolen login has detonated a ransomware attack and you're racing against a hacker who delights in your every misstep. You're not learning about poor password habits. You're living the consequences of them. You're hunting through logs, interrogating clues, and feeling that cold moment of recognition when someone's carelessness becomes everyone's catastrophe. That's behaviour change. Not a checkbox. Not a certificate. A realisation.
Why experiential learning sticks
Experiential learning creates neural shortcuts to memory because the learner has skin in the game... metaphorical, emotional, sometimes a little sweaty. It demands critical thinking on the fly, exposes blind spots, and forces the kind of cognitive work that actually alters behaviour. When the stakes feel authentic, people rise to meet them. They stop treating cyber as someone else's job and start seeing the risks through the only lens that matters... their own.
The stats have been screaming this at us for years. People retain barely five percent of a lecture, which is roughly the same as retaining the plot of a film you fell asleep during. Hands-on experience? Seventy-five percent. That's not a marginal improvement. It's a pedagogical mutiny. It means if your security culture is languishing, the problem isn't your people. It's the method you've shackled them to.
And when you watch what happens in a room where a team is trying to unlock a physical box, or scrambling through evidence, or playing cat-and-mouse, you see something that rarely appears in traditional training environments: people caring. People thinking. People actually enjoying the process of learning something consequential.
the psychology of "feeling the stakes"
This is what corporate learning forgets far too often. Humans don't learn because they're told to. They learn because the world around them becomes irresistible real... a puzzle, a story, a situation where they have to act. Experiential learning taps into that primal circuitry that loves challenge and hates being wrong. And frankly, if cyber risk is climbing, budgets are tightening, and attackers are getting cheekier by the day, L&D can't afford the luxury of teaching people passively anymore.
If you want employees who behave different when the real threat hits, you have to let them feel it. Not dangerously. Not traumatically. But vividly. Their memory should jolt like a struck match. Their instinct should sharpen. Their perspective should widen. And all of that happens only when the learning is alive, not anaesthetised.
the call to evolve: L&d, this one's on you
So yes, ditch the lectures. Retire the PowerPoint decks so old they're being quietly assessed for acquisition by The British Museum. Give your people something worth remembering. Because the future of cyber culture doesn't belong to those who can recite a policy. It belongs to those who've experienced the moment it all nearly went wrong, and decided, unequivocally, never again.
Keywords